ABSTRACT
Dr Eric Suba has been distorting facts and persistently disseminating biased and misleading views and statements regarding our studies over the past several years. His article in the Indian Journal of Medical Ethics fails to mention the facts that seem unfavourable to his arguments, and the ethical concerns are unsubstantiated by the evidence. In this context, we present the following clarifications for the attention of your readers, notably with regard to: (i) the study design and inclusion of a control group; (ii) the informed consent of the women participating in the study; (iii) the conformity with international ethical standards and guidelines, and (iv) the provision of screening to women in the control arm of the studies. We also highlight the benefits that are flowing from this research and the risk that misinformation may further delay access for women to life-saving cervical cancer screening.
ABSTRACT
The study in Osmanabad district, India , was organised to measure the effect of a single round of screening by HPV testing, or quality assured cytology, or visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) on cervical cancer incidence and mortality, whereas reductions in disease have followed repeated rounds of high-intensity screening in developed countries.
ABSTRACT
Background. The relevance of population-based cancer registries for planning and implementing cancer control programmes cannot be overemphasized. There are some urban registries in India but very few rural registries despite India being predominantly rural. There are several obstacles to setting up a rural registry including lack of cancer awareness in the rural population and inaccessibility of modern medical facilities. The first rural cancer registry was set up in 1987 at Barshi (population 0.4 million) in western Maharashtra by adopting a methodology suitable for rural areas. Methods. The innovative methodology supplemented the usual registry methodology by regular interaction with the community to educate them on warning signals for cancer, raise cancer awareness and motivate suspected individuals to seek medical attention. Cancer detection clinics were held in villages. Results. The reliability indices show that the registry is of an acceptable standard. The registry activity has increased cancer awareness in this population (p<0.01), increased the frequency of early cervical cancers (stages I and IIa) by more than 2-fold during the past 16 years and significantly decreased the relative risk of death (hazard ratio 0.7 [0.5–0.9]). Conclusion. The innovative methodology has facilitated the process of cancer registration in rural areas. It has had a positive impact on cancer awareness, stage at presentation and survival of cervical cancers—the predominant cancer in the area. The registry has created a resource for epidemiological studies in a rural area where national and international studies are currently being undertaken.